Carl Icahn, Stephen Sweeney Go At It Over Atlantic City’s Gambling Future

Carl Icahn, Stephen Sweeney Go At It Over Atlantic City’s Gambling Future

Carl Icahn accuses brand New Jersey State Senate President Stephen Sweeney of attempting to sell out Atlantic City by supporting a north Jersey casino.

Business Carl that is mogul Icahn New Jersey State Senate President Stephen Sweeney exchanged harsh words last Friday, with each accusing the other of selling out some portion of Atlantic City for their particular gain. The war of words started after Sweeney participated in protests with union employees from the Trump Taj Mahal, protests of which Icahn proved to become a major target.

Those protests were designed to fight back against a Trump Entertainment plan to break out of a contract and cut pensions and benefits for workers in order to cut costs and keep the casino open as we reported earlier this week.

The organization claims that the casino will have to close on November 13 unless numerous concessions are granted to it, including the cutbacks in employee benefits and $25 million in help from their state, along side a tax assessment that is reduced.

Workers Blame Icahn

But Icahn proved to be a figure that is major the protests. The protesters demonstrated near the Tropicana, which will be owned by a group led by Icahn, and many see him as the real threat to the benefits and wages made available from their present positions. In bankruptcy court, Trump Entertainment has required permission to turn its venue over to Icahn by transforming the debt he holds in the company into ownership of the casino. Icahn says he would then be willing to invest another $100 million in to the Taj Mahal, but only when his concessions are awarded.

Sweeney reacted for this by saying that there ended up being no method hawaii would contribute to the transfer that is proposed Icahn, and sharply criticized the investor’s plan for the casino.

‘he wants, he’s closing anyway,’ Sweeney said if he doesn’t get everything. ‘But then he’ll invest into the property. if they can get all this money from the taxpayers and the workers,’

Sweeney ended up being just one single of a few politicians from both major parties who criticized Icahn’s proposal at a Boardwalk press conference.

‘You get absolutely nothing from us until such time you treat workers with respect and dignity,’ Sweeney said.

Icahn Fires Back

But Icahn ended up being prepared to fire back at Sweeney and other state officials who’ve criticized him while also proposing that casinos be built in north Jersey.

‘Sweeney is attempting to sell out Atlantic City to New that is northern Jersey the one hand, and now he’s telling all these workers in Atlantic City that Carl Icahn is to blame, whenever I’m the only person that took a risk with $80 million when no one else would,’ Icahn said. ‘ On the one hand, we’re to trust Senator Sweeney is Atlantic City’s staunchest defender, yet on the other hand, similar Senator Sweeney is down in north Jersey making plans to permit gaming outside of New York City, a concession that will suggest the end of gaming in Atlantic City.’

Sweeney appears in United States District Court on this week in an attempt to get a judge to force the concessions he has asked for, as the state and Atlantic City have to date rejected his terms.

Trump Entertainment can also be hoping that the Delaware bankruptcy court will allow it to terminate the current union contract. The company is accusing the workers’ union of compromising 3,000 jobs at the Taj Mahal in an effort to safeguard workers at other casinos, as under the union contract, any concessions won at one casino would be allowed at all other Atlantic City casinos as well.

UK Gambling Act Challenge by GBGA Snuffed by London High Court

London’s High Court ruled against a GBGA challenge to your new UK Gambling Act, letting it be implemented month that is next. (Image:

Great britain Gambling Act will go into effect next thirty days after a challenge from the Gibraltar Betting and Gaming Association (GBGA) was rejected by the High Court week that is last. The challenge that is legal already been successful in delaying the execution of the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act from October 1 to November 1, however the ruling ensures that the legislation will be enforced as expected.

‘I have always been regarding the conclusion that parliament was well within its rights to act as it did,’ stated Lord Justice Nicholas Green.

GBGA Does Not Make Its Instance

In their ruling, Green said that the GBGA failed to show that the new regulations would be illegal underneath the laws of either the UK or europe. He also rejected a alternate plan proposed by the GBGA, a so-called ‘passporting’ plan, that would enable the GBGA to maintain complete certification control over its operators while agreeing to share data utilizing the British Gambling Commission (UKGC).

The ruling means that all online gambling operators who wish to conduct business with clients in britain will have to hold a license with the gambling payment here by November 1. This will not be a problem for most organizations that wanted to remain in the united kingdom, as most believed which they would need to apply for a license by October 1.

The real changes will come into play on December 1. That is whenever a point-of-consumption that is new is implemented in the UK on licensed operators. This will imply that all operators will probably pay a 15 percent income tax on the revenues derived from UK customers, regardless of where they are headquartered or what taxes they might pay in their house nations.

GBGA Still Has Concerns

The UKGC was happy with the decision, because the organization not just beat back the challenge, but was awarded £100,000 ($159,400) to pay for its costs that are legal.

‘We welcome this judgment and can now complete preparations for implementation of the Act on 1 November,’ the UKGC wrote in a statement.

Conversely, the GBGA expressed its disappointment with the court’s decision.

‘ Cross-border regulatory regimes require significant co-ordination and co-operation on key legal and regulatory issues and great britain already had this utilizing the Gibraltar industry, regulator and jurisdiction,’ the GBGA said after the ruling. ‘ We maintain this statutory law isn’t into the most readily useful interests of customers, the industry and the regulator itself and that you can find more effective means of dealing with the challenges of regulation and competition in this sector.’

The GBGA also stated that it may be time for European officials to show up with an framework that is overarching online gambling.

‘We remain concerned the UK regulator will find it difficult to hold businesses to account in jurisdictions outside the EU where it does not have any legal powers and typical legal framework or culture,’ the Association statement said. ‘Given this judgment there is now even greater importance of an EU framework that is legal online gambling if we have been to effectively protect all European consumers, enjoy a common market and avoid each member state deciding alone how to approach an activity that naturally crosses edges.’

The licensing that is new will even require operators to offer a legal rationale due to their operations in gray markets where they do not hold licenses. These requirements have led some operators to decide on not to apply for a UK license, though the most of major companies plan to stay static in great britain market.

From Here to Eternity: The Massachusetts Casino Journey

The Wynn Resorts casino proposition in Everett is the most current to win a permit from the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. (Image: Wynn Resorts Holdings)

Massachusetts casino certification law is back in the news in a way that is big week, as the Wynn Everett task won the Greater Boston casino permit after a contentious battle against a Mohegan Sun proposal. That choice, which was reached by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission in a vote that is 3-1 sets the phase for Steve Wynn to build his large resort in Everett, on the website of a former Monsanto plant on the outskirts of Boston.

But it’s also the culmination in excess of three years of laws and regulations, votes, debates and referendums, each of which combine to write the story of Massachusetts’ casino gambling law. In the event that you’re unknown with what are you doing in hawaii, right here’s a recap that is quick of you need to get right up to speed.

How It All Started

On November 22, 2011, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick signed the Gaming that is expanded Act. This bill allowed for four new gambling facilities to be built in the state: three casinos and one slots parlor. Each of the three casino licenses was tied to a region that is specific one for Western Massachusetts, one for the Greater Boston area, and one for Southeastern Massachusetts. The slots parlor could be built anywhere in the state.

Developers who wished to apply for one of the four licenses were needed to get with an application that is extensive, one that included mandatory referendums by local communities where casino proposals were made.

Those referendums ended up being a critical the main certification process, as several promising projects didn’t earn the approval of voters. Most notably, a plan for the casino at Suffolk Downs in East Boston had been scuttled when votes overwhelmingly rejected the proposition, which eventually led to that plan being resurrected on the Revere side of the Suffolk Downs racetrack.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to award licenses and to whom they need to go was determined by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, a five-member panel that oversaw the whole licensing process.

And the Award Goes To…

The first license was awarded to Penn National Gaming, which earned the right to build a slots parlor in Plainville in late February. That plan ended up being chosen over a Massachusetts Live! proposal in Leominster and a Raynham Park option that did not prove popular with the payment. Eventually, the payment voted 3-2 in favor of the Penn National plan over the Leominster alternative.

In the commission then approved MGM Resorts International for the Western Massachusetts casino license june. The payment voted unanimously in support of awarding the license to the proposed MGM resort in Springfield, which emerged since the contender that is only the region.

This week, the video gaming commission also awarded the Greater Boston casino license to a Wynn Resorts project in Everett. The Wynn plan had been chosen more than a Mohegan Sun proposal in Revere by a 3-1 vote, with gaming commission Chairman Stephen Crosby recusing himself through the process.

Southeastern Massachusetts License Still to Be Determined

Therefore far, few contenders that are serious emerged for the Southeastern Massachusetts casino license, which caused the video gaming commission to rebel the due date for applications from September 30, 2014 to December 1 of this year. The region’s timeline had been behind the rest of the continuing state because of the possibility that the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe might develop a casino in Taunton. When that effort felt through, the location was opened up to developers.

So far, just KG Urban has used to build in the region, though the commission believes that other candidates who had been rejected in the other two elements of the continuing state may take to once more in Southeastern Massachusetts.

casino saga slots of vegas

Casino Law Repeal Still a chance

There continues to be the possibility that every one of these venues may never open. There is opposition that is significant enabling casinos in Massachusetts since the law was first signed, and which has culminated in casino opponents finding a question on a statewide ballot this November which will ask voters if they want to repeal the casino law. Current polling suggests that such a repeal is not likely, however: one early September poll by UMass Lowell/7News found that 59 % of likely voters planed to vote against the repeal effort, with only 36 percent saying they’d vote to repeal what the law states.