Massachusetts High Court Hears Case for Casino Repeal Vote

Massachusetts High Court Hears Case for Casino Repeal Vote

Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley appears by her choice to reject a ballot proposal to repeal the state’s 2011 casino legislation. (Image: AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

Opponents of casino gambling in Massachusetts have been war that is waging the expansion on every battlefront possible. They’ve had wins and losings across the state, however they’ve constantly made their case. Now, they’re hoping that the court that is highest in Massachusetts gives them one last possiblity to place the matter before voters.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments week that is last the concern of whether a measure to repeal the 2011 casino law can show up on the statewide ballot in November. The move would essentially create a referendum on whether casinos could be built one which could disrupt the process also if it was to ultimately fail.

State Believes Implied Contracts Is Violated By Repeal

That disruption had been one of this main arguments made by solicitors for hawaii, including Attorney General Martha Coakley, whom rejected the petition it was unconstitutional because she felt. According to Coakley, such a repeal would cause damage to the ‘implied agreements’ between casino license applicants and the state gambling payment. She argued that those contract rights would be illegally taken away with no payment for the casino organizations.

Coakley made remarks at a break fast forum in Boston that further explained her position.

‘It is clear that although the founders wanted the individuals to own options other than their elected representatives in the home and Senate they also restricted those occasions in which they did, understanding that there is a way that is orderly which business associated with the individuals does proceed,’ she said.

Advocates Declare State Can Change Direction

Issue of how the state could back out of simply agreements with casino companies ended up being a heated subject during dental arguments. In particular, Justice Robert Cordy had questions about how a repeal would affect the Penn nationwide Gaming slots parlor in Plainville, which has been already awarded a license.

‘So a five-year exclusive license that has already been awarded after a thorough process outlined by the Legislature, at great price to the applicant, can simply be studied away having a big never mind?’ he asked Thomas O. Bean, a lawyer for many who require a repeal vote in the ballot.

‘Yes,’ Bean reacted.

‘They may do this without compensation…for all the investments that were made at the encouragement of the Legislature?’ Cordy asked later in the questioning.

‘That is correct,’ Bean said.

While that might sound flippant, Bean’s argument ended up being that taxpayers weren’t obligated to compensate the firms if the state changed its mind concerning the future of casino gambling. He also said that the casino teams have known there was a repeal effort was ongoing since the statutory legislation was passed, and that the possibility was certainly one of the known dangers they entailed if they began investing in the state.

Assistant Attorney General Peter Sacks outlined another possibility: that the gambling commission has the energy to simply reject every application and not award any casino licenses.

‘But that doesn’t mean the procurement process can be just canceled at the center after every person has invested a significant quantity of cash,’ he added.

A decision that is final anticipated from the court this summer, most likely timed to ensure the question can appear on the ballot if it really is approved. While a few of the questioning may have suggested doubt from the justices concerning the repeal, also those who strongly think it should perhaps not be on the ballot admit they are no outcome that is certain.

‘ This is a question that I believe is close,’ Coakley said. ‘I think the court could agree with us, but I do not have tea leaves on this.’

Arizona Will Allow Account Wagering for Horse and Dog Racing

New legislation shall allow Arizona residents to bet on horse races by phone. (Image:

We often act as though these measures affect all types of interactive betting equally when we talk about the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) or the Wire Act. But the truth of the situation is far different.

It has long been true that horse and dog racing along with state lotteries happen exempt from many of the regulations that stifle other online and phone-based gaming enterprises, as a result of certain exceptions in these laws. And that means that while getting any other form of remote betting passed is really a struggle at the very best of times, innovations happen in the horse and dog racing industries all the time.

Just week that is last Arizona Governor Janice Brewer signed an item of legislation in purchase to allow advance deposit wagering (ADW) at horse and greyhound events across her state. This will allow Arizonans to place bets from their domiciles, a large expansion for the state’s parimutuel industry that is betting.

Formerly, bets for such races were only taken at the tracks or at any of 62 certified off-track facilities that are betting hawaii.

Bill Does Not Authorize Online Betting

But while the move will make it much simpler for gamblers in the state to put bets on races any time they like, Governor Brewer made it clear that this isn’t an authorization of Internet gambling in every way.

‘This bill is explicitly clear that Arizona is authorizing advanced deposit wagering and expressly prescribes that the bet should be placed over the telephone,’ Governor Brewer wrote in a page to Secretary of State Ken Bennett. ‘Senate Bill 1282 does not authorize and can’t be construed as authorizing Internet gaming.’

If that weren’t clear enough, part 10 of the bill clearly remarks that the intent of the bill is not to allow for betting on the Internet.

It was also essential to Brewer that the bill did not affect standing agreements involving the state while the Native tribes that are american run gambling operations there.

‘There is an consensus that is unequivocal this bill does not impact nor cause any issue associated with the Arizona Tribal-State Gaming Compact,’ the governor wrote.

Bill Designed to Aid Racing Industry

The legislation ended up being spearheaded by Michael Racy, a lobbyist for Tuscon Greyhound Park. The idea had been to create an influx of more money in to the racing industry, a move that officials hope will keep live racing alive and well into the state.

‘[The bill] doesn’t authorize any brand new or different type of gaming,’ Racy said. ‘It simply recognizes that the world is changing on just how that happens.’

To be able to utilize the new ADW system, clients would have to transfer cash into a special account. After they did so, they may then just use the funds in that account to wager on races place that is taking participating tracks.

Gambling by phone won’t happen immediately. Arizona’s Department of Racing will need to develop rules before the operational system can get live, and that will take some time. However, you can find hopes that sporting fans could be placing bets from home as early as this summer.

While Governor Brewer did approve all of the bill, she exercised her line-item veto to strike one provision. That element of the bill would have appropriated $1.2 million to the Arizona Breeders’ Award Fund and the County Fair Racing Fund.

Caesars Entertainment Restructures Mega-Debt

Caesars’ current financial obligation load outstrips the City of Detroit; the casino operator now plans to reapportion some of that.

It could be the most famous gambling empire in the entire world, but Caesars Entertainment’s debt levels currently outstrip those associated with the bankrupt town of Detroit.

In the week that the company announced its first quarter earnings, Caesars also announced that it might be restructuring its debt that is colossal stands at $23 billion, a gaming industry all-time high.

Caesars will offer $1.75 billon in new debt to redeem its existing maturities for 2015, and will sell 5 % of Caesars Entertainment Operating Company to undisclosed investors. And even though the restructuring won’t reduce any of this business’s long-term debt, it will wipe out more than $1 billion of payments due in 2015, while leaving its lenders and bond-holders somewhat in the lurch.

Caesars is facing a lawsuit from two unnamed bondholders, which claim the casino giant had breached its ‘fiduciary duties’ to its creditors.

Avoiding Bankruptcy

The move have been predicted earlier in the day week that is last Moody’s Investor Services analyst Peggy Holloway, whom said the organization could have to restructure so that you can avoid bankruptcy. Holloway predicted Caesars would lose $1 billion in cash this season, and $2 billion next year.

‘ Recent asset product sales by Caesars’ private equity sponsors are weakening the hand that creditors provides to the dining table in the casino company’s inevitable restructuring,’ Holloway said. ‘ The asset is being reduced by the transactions base underlying the financial obligation, that will likely lead to much deeper losings for loan providers and bondholders upon a default.’

However, Caesars chairman and CEO Gary Loveman said the strategy would ‘lay the foundation for both significant de-leveraging and value creation at Caesars Entertainment.

‘Upon conclusion of the credit facility amendment … Caesars need added headroom under its maintenance covenant, supplying Caesars with additional stability to execute its business plan,’ he included. ‘If Caesars successfully lists its equity securities, this listing that is independent help facilitate the ultimate raising of equity along with obligation administration and debt decrease initiatives.’

When discussing dubious news, use the biggest words possible. Well-played, Gary.

Debt Management

Caesars additionally stated it was had by it sealed the deal regarding the sale of Bally’s, The Cromwell and The Quad to Caesars Growth Partners, with Harrah’s New Orleans likely to follow in very early summer. The four properties were valued at $2.2 billion, with $185 million in assumed debt.

‘The transaction was created to ensure continued access for Caesars and each regarding the properties being sold to the Total Rewards network and other Caesars resources,’ Loveman stated.

Caesars acquired most of its debt with regards to was taken private in 2008, after a $30.1 billion acquisition by Apollo Global Management and TPG Capital. Then, as the recession ravaged the gaming industry, Caesars, using its 50 casinos across the US, was hit the hardest. Publishing its very first quarter results immediately after the restructuring announcement, Caesars said it lost $386.4 million within the quarter that ended March 31, a loss of $2.82 per share. In the corresponding quarter a year ago the business lost $217.6 million, or $1.74 per share.

‘ Las Vegas remained a spot that is bright power in the hospitality categories, but regional business trends were unfavorably influenced by extreme weather and softness in visitation in the first quarter,’ said Loveman.