A UMass study on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is believed to be the largest in US history.
Gambling is definitely an important topic in Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two large resort gambling enterprises next few years.
In advance of that gaming expansion, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a research that gives a baseline for the state of gambling in the state now, one that can then be used to trace changes in long term studies.
The study, which comes from the School of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed nearly 10,000 Massachusetts residents.
That’s sufficient in order to make it the gambling study that is largest ever completed in the usa.
Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies
The study was praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who stated so it should provide an objective way to understand how a state has been influenced by gambling going ahead.
‘The most essential point is that we are establishing baseline conditions for every socio and economic variable that might be affected by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our scientists will then track changes in those variables within the entire life of the casinos in purchase to know up to a certainty the consequences and to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for just about any potential negative consequences.’
The study was conducted between September 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire.
The result was a wealth of information detailing exactly how people in Massachusetts gamble and view different forms of gaming.
For instance, it turns out that about 72 percent of respondents reported gambling at least one time on the year that is past.
Most Massachusetts residents (about 60 per cent) stated they played the lottery, while 22 percent reported that they’d gone to a casino during the previous year.
Residents Like Casinos, Yet Not Locally
One hot topic in the spot was how Massachusetts’ brand new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are directly to be concerned: 65 percent of the Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion that will go way down if the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.
The study also looked into just how residents feel about the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor or over to three casinos that are full-scale. The clear answer was one that has been heard in many communities through the state: not in my own backyard.
A good 59 percent majority of adults in Massachusetts said they think gambling expansion will either have neutral impact or be useful to the state.
But, 46 percent think that gambling expansion is harmful within their very own community, while only 28 % believe casino expansion would be useful locally.
The research additionally found that illegal gambling had been fairly typical in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports into the year that is past while two percent reporting gambling on unregulated Internet gaming web sites.
More analysis that is in-depth of data collected is anticipated to be released within the months to come. However, principal investigator Rachel Volberg states that the real value in this survey was collecting information before viewpoints could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.
‘Not many people realize exactly how uncommon it is for the problem gambling study to be completed before some new kind of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg said. ‘The Commonwealth is fortunate that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission therefore clearly and forcefully supported this kind of effort and I also am excited to share our findings before any gambling enterprises begin operations in our state.’
Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA
FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) then Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now figured FIFA doesn’t share the fundamental values of this police community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)
Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, paid to it by FIFA, to finance a joint anti-match-fixing program.
The 10-year Integrity in Sport initiative was designed to stamp out fixed games orchestrated by criminal wagering syndicates, but Interpol said this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.
‘In light of the context that is current FIFA, while Interpol continues to be committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, I have decided to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All partners that are external whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and maxims of the organization, aswell as those of the wider law enforcement community.’
The terms and conditions associated with deal, signed in 2011, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible aided by the principles, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, following arrest of seven FIFA officials while the outcome of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer body that is governing not held up its end of the bargain.
It begs the question, though, why had been Interpol, with its access that is wide-reaching to expansive network of police agencies, not aware of FIFA corruption last year?
The British press was crying foul as far back as 2006. This was the that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul year! The Key World of FIFA: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. It is said by the name all.
Additionally in 2006, Panorama, a BBC present affairs system, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter had been investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper more than a FIFA bribery scandal.
The former chairman of the English Football Association, described FIFA as an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’ in it, Lord Triesman,
A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he don’t.
Interpol’s willingness to bury its mind in the sand might have been more concerning the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the law that is international agency constituted more than 25 % of its annual budget.
Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the usa, the only country that dared to contain the organization planet 7 oz casino codes to task, it had been too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.
On a lighter note, the FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and think us, it is a zinger!
‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a motor vehicle,’ grinned De Gregorio.
‘But who’s driving?’ he quizzed.
‘The police,’ he zinged.
Shortly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had plumped for to ‘relinquish his office.’
Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Debt.
Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million dud check bounced when Ritz staff tried to cash it the day after his gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)
The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing a property that is swiss over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.
According to the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury had written out the check to invest in a gambling session one night in February last 12 months, but it turned into a dud when the casino tried to bank it the following morning.
The Ritz is also searching for an£ that is extra ($310,000) in accumulated interest on the debt.
It has been reported that the casino, that is owned by reclusive billionaire identical twins, Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red by way of a series of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively in the courts.
Based on the London night Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the last year alone in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).
Al Geabury’s defense is he is a gambling addict and his staff needs to have known this and stopped him from playing.
He wants the debts written off, but he is on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won an identical High Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the wife associated with Omani foreign minister.
The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had visited the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a hours that are few. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her debt. She quickly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken advantage of her.
Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a game title of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made alert to her gambling addiction, and also allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was illegal.
She also said that the casino had been under a ‘duty of care’ it had failed to fulfill towards her, a responsibility which.
Nevertheless, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a months that are few her see towards the Ritz.
In ruling in favor of the casino, the judge said he was certain that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to carry in gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would have already been eager and inclined to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and really most likely during her stay in London through the times or weeks after 3 April 2012.’
The judge within the Al Geabury instance, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, said at a initial hearing that psychiatric reports have already been commissioned to assess Al Geabury’s state of brain regarding the time he destroyed the money and whether he was in control of their actions.
‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury features a gambling addiction as well as the claimant’s familiarity with that,’ she said.